by Bill Gaylord » Sat Aug 24, 2013 6:59 pm
Adding the 14gms of weight needed to set the CG should pay off. I've learned to be as liberal as necessary with it, although I cram it as far forward as possible to minimize the amount. Some people are so conservative with adding ballast that the plane crashes from an aft CG. It would be good to see more info recorded on balance points, as I believe the plan points may be a bit aft. I know for rc flight they are often aft, although the lighter rubber power plane will probably be more tolerant. I fly the C150 at around 25mm which works well, but of course it's a heavier rc plane. BTW, I'm a big Microlite fan, and the C150 was one of the first planes where I used it on the wing and tail feathers. Sure lighter than most iron-on film coverings.
I'm sure you would enjoy building another for rc flight, as you mentioned. The C150 is one of the easiest, most relaxing planes I have to fly on rud/elev, and I'm sure the C170 would be very similar. I just got back from flying this evening, and let my flying buddy fly my 4ch rc Guillows Fairchild 24 with a small bl motor/Spektrum brick/separate liner servos for ailerons. He really enjoyed the flight, and the 24" Guillows high wing jobs seem to be lovely fling subjects for micro rc.