I have to work hard, to refrain myself from sending messages to some of these outright Ebay kit scammers. Got a kick out of Bill Parker's post. I'm sure everyone by now has seen the Sterling glider that has a bunch of junk in the box, without a single part appearing to actually be from the glider kit. See the photos for yourself:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Vintage-Sterlin ... 5d3f1ad261There should be some way of public posting for these auctions. Not as bad, but just dishonest are adds like this one, that show the Guillows P47 as being very rare. You would thing that everyone knows that there are more of them available than you can shake a stick at, but they still try to lure somebody into the sale with dishonest comments.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Very-RARE-Guill ... 35c7b68f90There was a guy recently who was trying to sell some vintage Guillows kits that actually had some value. He was getting no hits, due to his refusal to show photos. I PM'd him about it, and he responded with a bunch of excuses. One of them was that he didn't want to "disturb" the contents or lose any of them. Well I never asked him to do that. Simply removing the lid and taking a photo would be a big help. As for his rating defense, I've seen folks with higher numbers than his and near perfect 99.9% ratings, that still sell the occasional "burner box" kit.
My message:
"I would never want to ask for a refund on a kit. Modelers want to see a photo of the box contents, since the plastic has been removed and it has been opened in the past. We've learned not to take the public's word for things. Kit auctions showing the box contents draw more money. Some pro kit sellers like PVHC think that they don't have to, but even they would do better if they did."The response:
"Hi, I received your message and your point is well taken... I understand, but with all due respect I'm not sure that I totally agree! I have a few reasons for this. First, I hesitate to disturb the integrity of a kit when upon careful inspection I am as certain as I can be it is complete. My reason being, many of the parts in these vintage kits are loose. By removing the contents to photograph them, I risk accidentally loosing a part(s). Additionally, I've earned my excellent seller rating thru honesty, good ethics, and excellent customer service. This is not easily done and requires a committment to making every effort that each transaction is a positive experience. I would hope that this would afford my potential customers a certain comfort level and trust in me as a seller. Thank you for your understanding." The bottom line is that his Buy It Now prices were quite fair, and he did not sell the kits for quite a while. In an auction, he would certainly draw even more from the kits. I think he eventually realized I was correct about showing photos, but still refused to. Hopefully the Ebay consumer public will teach these people what the best practices are, but there is often somebody that still buys a less than 100% clearly or honestly represented sale.
Some other laughable sales are ones like this so called Rare Graupner B209 kit. The seller's been trying to sell this kit forever at high dollar. Regardless of whether it's rare or not, it's beat up and not a high value kit. The kicker is that he includes a Guillows decal kit in a non-Guillows kit, as if that's supposed to make it more desirable. Completely adds to the cheesyness and takes the prize of "box full-o-junk", in my book:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/1970s-Vintage-G ... 20d2e51348Edit: Just came back here, after almost hitting the buy button for a Guillows D7. Looks complete enough for the price, but would you buy something when the seller gives feedback like this, when there are problems?
He labels his customers as illiterate and deadbeats. Nice guy here. Great attitude:
http://feedback.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.d ... gative_365